
SamsungGood TimingGood Time to Buy — Early in the product cycle
Galaxy S25 FE
Affiliate Disclosure: We may earn a commission when you buy through links on our site. This does not influence our editorial recommendations. Learn more about how we make money
Clara’s Verdict
GoodThe S25 FE looks great and takes solid photos, but the battery won't make it through a full day without charging.
Best for: budget-conscious families, people who charge daily anyway, Samsung fans on a tight budget
Skip if: anyone who needs all-day battery, people who want flagship performance, heavy gamers
Ethan’s Verdict
AverageA $510 phone with a $400 processor and battery life that barely makes it through a workday.
Best for: Samsung loyalists, users who prioritize software updates
Skip if: power users, anyone needing reliable battery life, photography enthusiasts
Clara’s Pros & Cons
- +Stunning AMOLED display rivals expensive phones
- +Solid camera in good light with nice zoom
- +Seven years of software updates included
- +Affordable price for what you're getting
- −Battery barely lasts 10 hours, requires daily charging
- −Back panel scratches and scuffs too easily
- −Processor noticeably slower than flagship rivals
Ethan’s Pros & Cons
- +Display quality matches phones costing twice as much
- +45W charging reaches 40% in 15 minutes
- +Seven years of guaranteed software updates
- −Battery dies before the workday ends
- −Exynos processor is a year behind competitors
- −Back panel scuffs and scratches too easily
- −Telephoto camera is below average for the price
Score Breakdown
Performance6.510% wt
Display8.510% wt
Camera7.025% wt
Battery Life4.515% wt
Design & Build7.520% wt
Software & Features7.05% wt
Value8.515% wt
Score Breakdown
Performance5.020% wt
Display8.015% wt
Camera6.015% wt
Battery Life4.015% wt
Design & Build5.510% wt
Software & Features7.015% wt
Value8.510% wt
Clara’s Full Review
Real Talk: It's Pretty but Needs Babying
Honestly, the Galaxy S25 FE is a mixed bag. Let me break down what matters for everyday life.
The display is genuinely gorgeous. Reviewers rave about the AMOLED screen, and at 1,133 nits brightness, you can actually see it outside during pickup or at the park. Colors pop, blacks are deep, and the 120Hz refresh feels buttery when you're scrolling through Instagram or texting. This is one of those things that makes you smile every time you use the phone.
The camera is solid for a budget phone. In daylight, the 50MP main sensor takes nice photos with good color. The 8MP telephoto with 3x zoom works well for zooming in on the kids' soccer game without getting too close. Night mode handles low light reasonably, though reviewers noticed the colors run warm. It's not as detailed as the Pixel or iPhone, but it's totally usable for family photos and social media snaps.
Here's where it gets real: the battery is a dealbreaker for some people. Reviewers tested it at just under 10 hours, which means you're charging it during the day or scrambling to top it up before evening. If you're someone who needs your phone to last from morning through late night without thinking about it, this isn't your phone. The 45W fast charging helps, but you'll still be tethered to a charger more than you'd like.
The design looks premium and modern, very Samsung flagship vibes. But reviewers found the back panel scratches way too easily. You'll absolutely need a case, which adds to the cost and bulk.
At $450-$510, though, you're getting a lot. The display quality alone would cost you $200 more on other budget phones. The camera is competent. The promise of seven years of updates is genuinely valuable if you want to keep your phone working for a long time. For families on a budget who don't mind charging daily, this works. For people who need all-day battery life, look elsewhere.
The processor is noticeably slower than flagship chips, but for everyday tasks like texting, streaming, and social media, it's fine. Nothing feels broken, just not lightning-fast.
Ethan’s Full Review
The Price Doesn't Excuse the Processor
Samsung's positioning the Galaxy S25 FE as an affordable entry point, but the business math doesn't work. At $510, you're paying flagship money for a phone built around the Exynos 2200, a processor that was already outdated when Samsung released it. Geekbench scores of 2142 single-core and 7066 multi-core put this firmly in the midrange, yet reviewers consistently report lag in everyday use. That's not acceptable at this price.
The real issue is battery life. Tom's Guide measured 9 hours and 46 minutes of runtime, which means you're hunting for a charger by mid-afternoon. A 4500 mAh battery in a 6.4-inch phone is undersized, and no amount of software optimization fixes that fundamental design choice. Samsung could have used a larger cell here, but instead they prioritized thinness. The 45W charging is fast, but fast charging is a patch on a broken battery strategy, not a solution.
What's concerning is the camera inconsistency. The 50MP main sensor performs decently in good light but loses detail compared to the Pixel 10 and iPhone 17. The 8MP telephoto is a significant downgrade from the S25 Plus and shows below-average performance. Low-light handling has an overly warm color temperature that reviewers flagged as unnatural. For a phone at this price, you'd expect more consistency.
The display is the only genuinely impressive component. The 6.4-inch AMOLED reaches 1133 nits peak brightness with Delta-E color accuracy of 0.21, and 120Hz refresh is standard. This is premium-tier hardware, which makes the rest of the phone feel like a compromise.
Design is dated, and the back panel scuffs far too easily according to Tom's Guide. That's sloppy at any price point. The seven-year update promise is valuable for longevity, but it doesn't address the fundamental problem: you're getting last-generation performance in a new phone.
Bottom line: the S25 FE is cheap enough that the value score is respectable, but cheap doesn't mean good. You're trading performance, battery life, and build quality for a lower price. At $510, there are better options that offer more balanced hardware. This phone is built for people who care more about the Samsung name than actual specifications.
Specifications
| camera | 12 MP triple camera |
| battery | 4500 mAh |
| display | 6.4-inch AMOLED |
| storage | 128 GB |
| processor | Exynos 2200 |
Overall Rating
Related Reviews
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra vs iPhone 17 vs Pixel 10 Pro XL: Which Flagship Wins?
Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra takes the crown with its stunning display, versatile cameras, and complete feature set. See how it beats iPhone 17 and Pixel 10 Pro XL.
Google Pixel 9 Pro vs Apple iPhone 16 Pro: Which $999 Flagship Wins?
Google Pixel 9 Pro and Apple iPhone 16 Pro both cost $999, but only one deserves your money. We compare cameras, performance, and value to pick a winner.
iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra: Which Flagship Wins?
Apple iPhone 16 Pro Max vs Samsung Galaxy S25 Ultra head-to-head. We compare cameras, performance, displays, and value to crown the ultimate flagship winner.
Alternatives Worth Considering
Review History
Initial review from real source data
Initial review from real source data
Editorial Independence
Our reviews are based on research from trusted expert sources. We may earn commissions from affiliate links, but this never influences our ratings or recommendations. How we score · Editorial policy · Report an error
Related Smartphones
SamsungDeals LikelyNewer model likely available — look for deals on this one
Galaxy S25 Ultra
Lowest Price Vendor Auto-Selected
Lowest Price Vendor Auto-Selected



